![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.parkrag.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/schol1.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.parkrag.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/schol2.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\nBy striking through “that have been declared closed to open enrollment,” the district appears to intend not to guarantee a spot at the teacher’s school. By adding, “The exception is not a guarantee of admission to an otherwise closed school\u2026” it drives home the point. They don’t want this to happen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
For those that don’t follow our schools quite as closely, what is a closed school? No, it’s not due to Covid-19. It’s a school where the district has determined there is no more room. It’s an arbitrary number that the district reports to the state. If a school is “open to enrollment,” then children from outside the PCSD area can attend Park City Schools. As stated before, even if a school was closed, generally, teachers could count on their kids attending the same school they teach at. Now, that opportunity seems highly unlikely.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
By the way, as of now, all Park City schools are closed to open enrollment. I\u2019m not sure that\u2019ll remain the case. If so, I\u2019m not sure what that means for any teacher who has children entering the district.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Now that the district has decided to revoke that privilege from teachers, citing enrollment, cost concerns, and policy alignment, we are left wondering why. To us at the Park Rag, this doesn\u2019t pass the smell test.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 1: Park City schools have slowly trended down in enrollment over the last decade or so. We\u2019re an increasingly rich and retired community, and when a median home costs $1.5 million, there aren\u2019t a lot of families with kids that can afford to live here. Even the district itself predicts declining enrollment going forward. We don\u2019t have a problem with capacity, though the distribution of students between schools may need some tweaks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Here is a Park Record article on the subject<\/a>. Here is another<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2: Per pupil funding is minimally affected by allowing out-of-district teachers\u2019 children to attend the school they work at and not affected at all by in-district transfers \u2013 the state allocates the same money per child for the school regardless of whether they are a teacher\u2019s kid or live in the district. There\u2019s not a money problem here.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 3: According to our sources (teachers and district employees) in-district transfers to ostensibly closed schools have been approved this year \u2013 while teachers have been denied. It would be great to let anyone enroll anywhere, but if we\u2019re going to give preferential treatment to any group in enrolling outside of their district or zone, it probably should be teachers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Given the reality that other districts in Utah are now paying as much as or more than PCSD, and that we can\u2019t hope to recruit the best of the best teachers (especially if they can\u2019t bring their kids\u2026), being able to enroll your kids at your school is a very effective way to attract top talent. It\u2019s also a benefit that has been provided for years that is suddenly being taken away for no apparent reason.<\/p>\n\n\n\n We reached out to the school district for comment. The district responded, “The Open Enrollment Policy at PCSD was updated in January 2021 to ensure that it is aligned to the Code as well as for clarification of the enrollment paperwork process, which remains the same as it has previously, other than asking that employees complete the 1-page enrollment form annually…Adjustments in the language were not intended to adjust\/alter educators\u2019 or staff participation in the process or their ability to apply for enrollment. The district and school board see open enrollment as a positive and the policy reads, ‘In order to enhance the district\u2019s ability to attract and retain qualified employees from outside district boundaries, the children of employees who work at least three-quarter time shall be allowed to apply to attend schools within the district.’ District employees are encouraged to submit their Open Enrollment application in the event they are interested in having their children attend a Park City School. The process, parameters or practices related to staff’s open enrollment has not changed meaning – as long as space is available – which has always been the standard practice – students are able to be enrolled within the schools. Once a student has been enrolled, they matriculate with their grade level and enrollment capacity is reevaluated at times of transition such as K-5, 6-7, 8-9, and then 10-12.\u201d The response in its entirety is at the conclusion of this story.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n While this makes it sound like nothing has changed, it feels like it has. We\u2019ve heard from teachers who have been denied enrollment for children at the school they teach at. We\u2019ve seen letters telling teachers to apply to other schools in the district and they may get the children into those schools if the school is open for enrollment. This doesn\u2019t appear to match the process that was in place previously. Finally, if the change was all about getting paperwork in order, why change pieces of the policy to exclude closed schools from teachers?<\/p>\n\n\n\n It doesn\u2019t make sense to someone on the outside. Perhaps the district received a legal recommendation stating that they couldn\u2019t provide these benefits to teachers. Perhaps the district feels they\u2019ll get more out of a teacher if their child isn\u2019t in the same school. Perhaps they are posturing for a bond offering (or something similar) based on the fact that we need to expand schools and they want to be able to say they are doing everything to limit enrollment. Or perhaps they really did just want to clarify the policy and disrupt a bunch of teachers lives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Any way you slice it, it doesn\u2019t seem like good policy. It is starting to impact teachers as they contemplate next year. Some of our best teachers may decide to go elsewhere because they work at Trailside and can only get their kid into McPolin \u2014 or perhaps nowhere in Park City.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The district needs to provide some clear reasoning for this decision backed up with facts, not just hand-waving about money concerns, crowding, or policy. Nothing kills morale like unpopular policy changes made without a clear rationale. If we want great teachers in the future, we need to do right by the ones we have now.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Think this is outrageous? You can make your voice heard by contacting the school board and\/or superintendent Gildea here: https:\/\/www.pcschools.us\/school-board\/members\/<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Response from the School District to a request for a comment:<\/p>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.parkrag.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/schol3.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n