{"id":6052,"date":"2016-07-06T16:17:32","date_gmt":"2016-07-06T22:17:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.parkrag.com\/?p=6052"},"modified":"2016-07-06T16:17:32","modified_gmt":"2016-07-06T22:17:32","slug":"park-city-strikes-back","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/v2.parkrag.com\/index.php\/2016\/07\/06\/park-city-strikes-back\/","title":{"rendered":"Park City Strikes Back"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Me thinks this is getting interesting&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Below is the Park City Municipal press release on the Park City trademark case, as it relates to Vail:<\/p>\n<hr class=\"stag-divider stag-divider--dotted\" \/>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 1\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<p><strong>PRESS RELEASE<\/strong><br \/>\nFOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:<\/p>\n<p>Matt Dias, Assistant City Manager 435-615-5180 office<\/p>\n<p>PARK CITY DISAPPOINTED IN VAIL TRADEMARK RESPONSE<\/p>\n<p>City Council to file for another 60-day extension to file Opposition with U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Mayor to ask City Council to suspend Redevelopment\/Base Area talks<\/p>\n<p>Park City, Utah \u2013 July 5, 2016<\/p>\n<p>Park City\u2019s Mayor Jack Thomas announced his \u201cdisappointment\u201d with the letter Park City received from Park City Mountain Resort Chief Operating Officer Bill Rock regarding the ski area\u2019s \u201cunwillingness to honor their public statements by putting real commitments into a real agreement.\u201d Thomas continued, \u201cThe City Council directed our attorneys to simply convert what we heard firsthand and publicly from Vail into a binding agreement. No more, no less. And Vail balked, essentially saying just \u2018trust us\u2019 and we \u2018will consider\u2019 your concerns down the road. Well that just isn\u2019t good enough.\u201d Park City sought to simply memorialize Vail\u2019s commitments to: 1) not oppose existing municipal and local business use of \u201cPark City\u201d; 2) broadly allow third parties in the future to also use \u201cPark City\u201d; and 3) eliminate confusion with existing municipal and local business signage, advertising, and other coexistence uses. In return, Park City would not oppose the trademark application and would affirmatively allow continued national and international use of the new \u201cPark City\u201d brand.<\/p>\n<p>Park City had previously obtained an extension until July 9, 2016 to file an opposition to the trademark application for the word mark \u201cPark City\u201d by VR CPC Holdings, Inc. (\u201cVail Resorts\u201d). The City intends to file for another 60-day extension this week. Thomas stated, \u201cI hope the additional time allows both sides to continue to work toward a reasonable solution.\u201d However, the City will continue to prepare its formal opposition to the application. Thomas added, \u201cThis narrowing of the mark from \u201cPark City Mountain<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 2\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<p>Resort \u201cto \u201cPark City\u201d is a new brand for a new product, which culminated from combining two previously distinct ski resorts, and everyone knows it.\u201d Furthermore, Thomas indicated that if progress does not continue toward an agreement, that he intends \u201cto ask the City Council at the July 28th City Council meeting whether the City should continue talks regarding potential collaborative projects in the Lower Park Avenue Redevelopment Area and ski resort planning projects, including the Park City Mountain Resort\/Vail Master Plan.\u201d Park City previously had entered into a Letter of Intent with the prior owners of the Park City Mountain Resort regarding the possible contribution of RDA funds in potential projects involving parking, transportation, and affordable housing.<\/p>\n<p>The draft agreement proposed by Park City Municipal can be viewed at the city\u2019s website.<\/p>\n<p>The City also announced it has secured outside legal services from Brent Lorimer and David Dellenbach at Workman Nydegger in Salt Lake City.<\/p>\n<p>###<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Me thinks this is getting interesting&#8230; Below is the Park City Municipal press release on the Park City trademark case, as it relates to&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"content-type":""},"categories":[74,44],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/v2.parkrag.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6052"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/v2.parkrag.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/v2.parkrag.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/v2.parkrag.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/v2.parkrag.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6052"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/v2.parkrag.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6052\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/v2.parkrag.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6052"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/v2.parkrag.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6052"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/v2.parkrag.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6052"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}